Detection of Right-to-left Shunt in Young Patients after Ischemic Stroke – a Pilot Study

Czech version

Authors: M. Kuliha ^1,2; M. Roubec ¹; A. Goldírová ^1,3; E. Hurtíková ¹; J. Krajča ⁴; V. Procházka ⁴ ; M. Kolek ⁵; R. Herzig ⁶; D. Školoudík ^1–3
Authors‘ workplace: Neurologická klinika LF OU a FN Ostrava ¹; Neurologická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze ²; Ústav ošetřovatelství, FZV UP v Olomouci ³; Radiologický ústav, FN Ostrava ⁴; Kardiochirurgické centrum, FN Ostrava ⁵; Komplexní cerebrovaskulární centrum, Neurologická klinika LF UK a FN Hradec Králové ⁶
Published in: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2016; 79/112(5): 541-545
Category: Original Paper
doi: https://doi.org/10.14735/amcsnn2016541

Overview

Aim:
The aim of the pilot study was to assess correlation between three diagnostic methods – contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE), contrast transcranial Doppler (cTCD) and Flow detection system Anazen^TM (FDS) – in detecting right-to-left shunts in young patients aged under 55 years with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

Patients and methods:
All consecutive patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke or TIA aged 18–55 years and able to perform sufficient Valsalva maneuver who signed informed consent were enrolled to the study from 8/2014 to 4/2015. Brain-computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging as well as detection of right-to-left shunt using the cTEE, cTCD and FDS were performed in all patients after an onset of stroke/TIA. Correlations of the results between the methods and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of cTCD and FDS compared to cTEE as a gold standard were statistically evaluated.

Results:
In total, 30 patients (21 males, mean age 46.2 ± 8.5 years) were included in the study. Right-to-left shunt was detected in the same eight (26.7%) patients using the cTEE and cTCD, and in one additional patient (totally nine, 30.0%) using FDS. Spearman`s coefficient for cTEE and FDS was 0.92 and for cTEE and cTCD 1.00. Interclass correlation coefficient was 0.975. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, respectively, for cTCD and 100%, 95.5%, 88.9%, 100%, respectively, for FDS.

Conclusion:
Correlation between cTCD and FDS as a new method with cTEE as a gold standard in right-to-left shunt detection appear to be high. Considering the ease of their use, both cTCD and FDS appear as suitable screening methods.

Key words:
stroke – right-to-left shunt – patent foramen ovale

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.

Sources

1. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, et al. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2 (1): 43–53.

2. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2008; 117 (4): e25–146.

3. Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59 (1): 17–20.

4. McGaw D, Harper R. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic cerebral infarction. Intern Med J 2001; 31 (1): 42–7.

5. Overell JR, Bone I, Lees KR. Interatrial septal abnormalities and stroke: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Neurology 2000; 55 (8): 1172–9.

6. Alsheikh-Ali AA, Thaler DE, Kent DM. Patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: incidental or pathogenic? Stroke 2009; 40 (7): 2349–55. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.547828.

7. Anzola GP, Magoni M, Guindani M, et al. Potential source of cerebral embolism in migraine with aura: a transcranial Doppler study. Neurology 1999; 52 (8): 1622–5.

8. Sztajzel R, Genoud D, Roth S, et al. Patent foramen ovale, a possible cause of symptomatic migraine: a study of 74 patients with acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002; 13 (2): 102–6.

9. Mojadidi MK, Bokhoor PI, Gevorgyan R, et al. Sleep apnea in patients with and without a right-to-left shunt. J Clin Sleep Med 2015; 11 (11): 1299–304. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5190.

10. Schneider B, Zienkiewicz T, Jansen V, et al. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography and correlation with autopsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77 (14): 1202–9.

11. Hausmann D, Mügge A, Becht I, et al. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography and association with cerebral and peripheral embolic events. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70 (6): 668–72.

12. Pearson AC, Labovitz AJ, Tatineni S, et al. Superiority of transesophageal echocardiography in detecting cardiac source of embolism in patients with cerebral ischemia of uncertain etiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17 (1): 66–72.

13. Caputi L, Carriero MR, Falcone C, et al. Transcranial Doppler and transesophageal echocardiography: comparison of both techniques and prospective clinical relevance of transcranial Doppler in patent foramen ovale detection. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 18 (5): 343–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2008.12.001.

14. Spencer MP, Moehring MA, Jesurum J, et al. Power m-mode transcranial Doppler for diagnosis of patent foramen ovale and assessing transcatheter closure. J Neuroimaging 2004; 14 (4): 342–9.

15. González-Alujas T, Evangelista A, Santamarina E, et al. Diagnosis and quantification of patent foramen ovale. Which is the reference technique? Simultaneous study with transcranial Doppler, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Rev Esp Cardiol 2011; 64 (2): 133–9. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2010.10.009.

16. Chimowitz MI, Nemec JJ, Marwick TH, et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound identifies patients with right-to-left cardiac or pulmonary shunts. Neurology 1991; 41 (12): 902–4.

17. Di Tullio M, Sacco RL, Massaro A, et al. Transcranial Doppler with contrast injection for the detection of patent foramen ovale in stroke patients. Int J Card Imaging 1993; 9 (1): 1–5.

18. Jauss M, Kaps M, Keberle M, et al. A comparison of transesophageal echocardiography and transcranial Doppler sonography with contrast medium for detection of patent foramen ovale. Stroke 1994; 25 (6): 1265–7.

19. Clinical Study Reports CDX-1119,1187 REV.B-D. Cardiox Shunt Detection Technology Study. Dublin: Cardiox Corporation 2012.

20. Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (11): 991–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009639.

21. Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (12): 1092–100. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301440.

22. Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (12): 1083–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211716.

23. Nagaraja V, Eslick GD. Stroke prevention by percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a meta-analytic review. Int J Cardiol 2014; 172 (2): 524–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.01.026.

24. Wöhrle J, Bertrand B, Søndergaard L, et al. PFO closuRE and CryptogenIc StrokE (PRECISE) registry: a multi-center, international registry. Clin Res Cardiol 2012; 101 (10): 787–93.