Influencing factors for axial symptoms after modified expansive open-door laminoplasty

Overview

Aim: We aimed to observe the incidence of axial symptoms (AS) after modified expansive open- -door laminoplasty (EOLP), and to analyze the influencing factors for AS. Methods: Eighty patients undergoing modified EOLP from May 2020 to May 2022 were selected. They were followed up for 12 months after operation and divided into an AS group and a non-AS group. Their baseline data were recorded. The influencing factors for AS after modified EOLP were explored through binary logistic regression analysis. Results: During the 12-month follow-up after modified EOLP, AS occurred in 26 (32.5%) of the 80 cases. In the AS group, the preoperative spinal cord compression rate (PSCR) was higher than that of the non-AS group, the postoperative spinal cord posterior displacement distance was longer, and the postoperative intervertebral flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) was statistically significantly smaller (P < 0.05). Increased PSCR and increased postoperative spinal cord posterior displacement distance were risk factors for AS after modified EOLP (odds ratio [OR] > 1; P < 0.05), and elevated postoperative intervertebral flexion-extension ROM was a protective factor (OR < 1; P < 0.05). Conclusion: PSCR, postoperative spinal cord posterior displacement distance and postoperative intervertebral flexion-extension ROM are closely associated with the incidence of AS after modified EOLP.

Keywords:

range of motion – axial symptom – expansive open-door laminoplasty – infl uencing factor

Introduction

Modified expansive open-door laminoplasty (EOLP), as a common posterior cervical spine surgery, is mainly applied in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy such as ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament and spinal stenosis [1]. Following modified EOLP, the spinal cord injury of patients is relieved and the risk of postoperative complications is reduced through partial resection of the vertebral lamina on both ends and central laminoplasty [2]. However, axial symptoms (AS) still occur in some patients after modified EOLP. AS is a common complication of posterior cervical spine surgery, which can cause posterior cervical tenderness and muscle spasm, seriously affecting postoperative recovery and lowering the quality of life [3]. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the influencing factors for the incidence of AS after modified EOLP. Logistic analysis is a generalized linear regression analysis model often used for data mining, so it is of great significance for exploring the risk factors for diseases [4].

Thus, the influencing factors for AS after modified EOLP were explored by logistic analysis in this study, aiming to provide novel insights into future prevention and treatment.

Patients and methods

General data

A total of 80 patients undergoing modified EOLP from May 2020 to May 2022 were selected as the subjects, including 45 males and 35 females. The mean age was (63.50 ± 3.07) years, ranging from 54 to 73 years. The body mass index was 21–28 kg/m², with a mean of (24.50 ± 1.07)  kg/m². The duration of primary diseases was 13–23 months, with a mean of (18.05 ± 1.56) months. In terms of the primary diseases, there were 46 cases of cervical spinal stenosis, 25 cases of multi-segmental disc herniation and 9 cases of calcification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. As for underlying diseases, arterial hypertension occurred in 36 cases and diabetes mellitus in 7 cases. Besides, 26 cases had a smoking history and 42 cases had a drinking history.

The inclusion criteria were as follows:

1. patients diagnosed as cervical spinal stenosis, multi-segmental disc herniation and calcification of posterior longitudinal ligament by imaging examination;

2. those undergoing modified EOLP;

3. those with the symptoms of spinal cord compression before treatment and failed conservative treatment for 3 months or longer, all accompanied by various degrees of numbness and weakness in the limbs;

4. those undergoing surgery performed by the same group of surgeons;

5. those who and whose family members signed the informed consent form.

 

The exclusion criteria were as follows:

1. patients with a history of cervical spine surgery;

2. those with cervical deformity or instability;

3. those with cervical spinal cord injury caused by trauma or tumor;

4. those with inverted cervical curvature shown by X-ray examination;

5. those with a history of neck sprain or frozen shoulder;

6. those with a history of chronic pain before surgery, including neuralgia, headache and trigeminal neuralgia.

 

Surgical procedures

Modified EOLP was performed. Specifically, after general anesthesia, the patients were placed in a prone position with the head fixed using a Mayfield head frame (Mizuho Medical Group, Tokyo, Japan), followed by routine disinfection and draping. A cervical posterior median incision was made, the nuchal ligament was incised, and paravertebral muscles were separated under the periosteum on both sides of the spinous process to fully expose the C₃ and C₆ spinous processes. A bone slot was created at 2 mm of the inner margin of small joint on the open-door side where the symptoms were severe, while a V-shaped bone slot was created deep to the medial cortex of bone using a high-speed drill (Dentis Co., Ltd., Seoul, South Korea) on the hinge side. The door was opened using a 1 mm ultra-thin lamina rongeur (Synthes GmbH, Oberdorf, Switzerland). The operation was conducted based on preoperative MRI images. In the case of spinal cord compression at C_2–3, the C₃ lamina was completely excised and the C_2–3 ligamentum flavum was cleared. In the case of no spinal cord compression, the C₃ lamina was partly excised. Among those preoperatively with spinal cord compression at C_6–7, the C_6–7 ligamentum flavum was partly excised, the C₇ vertebral dome was partly excised for undermining spinal canal decompression, and the C₇ lamina was preserved intact. Next, the C_4–6 laminae were lifted one by one towards the door axis side, and lifted while being separated if the adhesion was severe. The ligamentum flavum and adhesion zone at the edge of the vertebral lamina were removed, and the inner margin of facet joint was removed to fully expose the dural sac thorough decompression. Afterwards, a mini titanium plate (Syntec Scientific Corporation, Shenkang, China) was placed on the open-door side, and fixed on the vertebral lamina and lateral mass with screws. After the C_4–6 spinous process was trimmed, the incision was sutured layer by layer. Following the surgery, the patients wore a cervical collar.

 

Diagnostic criteria for AS and grouping method

The patients were followed up for 12 months after operation by telephone call and outpatient review. According to the related diagnostic criteria [5], AS was defined as neck--shoulder pain or new-onset persistent pain dominated by neck pain 3 months after operation (which could not be explained by other reasons), lasting for ≥ 1 month, with a visual analog scale (VAS) score > 2 points [6]. The patients were divided into AS group and non-AS group according to the presence or absence of AS.

 

Baseline data

The baseline data of patients were collected, including sex (male/female), age (≥ 60 years, < 60 years), body mass index (≥ 24 kg/m², < 24 kg/m²), type of primary diseases (cervical spinal stenosis, multi-segmental disc herniation, and calcification of the posterior longitudinal ligament), duration of primary diseases, preoperative neck-shoulder pain (Yes, No), intraoperative blood loss (> 100 mL, ≤ 100 mL), preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score (the patient‘s physical function was assessed using the JOA score before operation [7], and the higher the score [totally 29 points], the more severe the dysfunction), operation time, preoperative spinal cord compression rate (PSCR) (the ratio of the sagittal diameter of spinal cord compressed by herniated intervertebral disc and/or protruding osteophyte of the compressed segment to that of spinal canal in the same plane on the midsagittal T2-weighted image of the cervical spine), postoperative intervertebral flexion-extension range of motion (ROM), postoperative spinal cord posterior displacement distance, diabetes [random blood glucose ≥ 11.10 mmol/L (Yes, No) ], arterial hypertension [diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg and/or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg (Yes, No) ], smoking history (Yes, No), and drinking history (Yes, No).

 

Statistical analysis

SPSS25.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Measurement data were described by mean ± standard deviation (x− ± s), and intergroup comparisons were performed using the independent-samples t-test. Count data were described by percentage (%), and subjected to the c² test. The influencing factors for AS after modified EOLP were explored through binary logistic regression analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

RESULTS

Incidence of AS after modified EOLP

During the 12-month follow-up after modified EOLP, AS occurred in 26 (32.5%) of 80 cases.

Baseline data of patients

The AS group had a higher PSCR, longer post--operative spinal cord posterior displacement distance, and a smaller postoperative intervertebral flexion-extension ROM than those of the non-AS group (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in other data between the two groups (P > 0.05) (Tab. 1).

 

Results of binary logistic analysis of incidence of AS after modified EOLP

Simple logistic regression analysis was conducted, with the incidence of AS after modified EOLP as the dependent variable (“0” = AS, “1” = non-AS), and the statistically significant factors in Table 1 (PSCR, postoperative intervertebral flexion-extension ROM, and postoperative spinal cord posterior displacement distance) as the independent variables. Then the P value was set to < 0.1, and eligible factors were incorporated in binary logistic regression analysis. The results showed that increased PSCR and increased postoperative spinal cord posterior displacement distance were risk factors for AS after modified EOLP (OR >1; P < 0.05), while an increased postoperative intervertebral flexion-extension ROM was a protective factor (OR < 1; P < 0.05) (Tab. 2).

 

Discussion

Axial symptoms are mainly caused by factors such as destruction of the posterior cervical ligament complex, peeling off of C2 and C7 spinous process muscles, reduced mobility of the cervical spine, weakened neck strength, and local tissue adhesion and scar formation after cervical spine surgery [8]. Hunter et al. found that the incidence rate of AS after modified EOLP was 45–80% [9], higher than that (32.5%) in this study, which may be related to the difference between surgical skills. Compared to traditional posterior cervical expansive laminoplasty, modified EOLP can keep the vertebral stability, shorten the neck collar wearing time, promote rehabilitation and functional recovery shortly after surgery, and reduce the number of patients with postoperative axial pain, but AS may still occur [10]. Therefore, it is still necessary to find the factors related to the incidence of AS.

In this study, PSCR in the AS group was higher, the postoperative spinal cord posterior displacement distance was longer, and the postoperative intervertebral flexion--extension ROM was smaller than those of the non-AS group. The results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that increased PSCR and increased postoperative spinal cord posterior displacement distance were risk factors for AS after modified EOLP, while an increased postoperative intervertebral flexion-extension ROM was a protective factor.

The possible reasons are as follows. First, PSCR can reflect the overall status of anterior cervical spinal cord compression [11]. A higher PSCR means more evident posterior expansion of the dura mater following modified EOLP. During posterior expansion, the traction of the denticulate ligament and surrounding connecting structures against the spinal cord may be increased, thus causing cervical muscle tension and fatigue and inducing AS [12]. Meanwhile, the patients with a high PSCR suffer from greater pressure and obvious deformation of the cervical spinal cord, which can damage the vascular autonomic nerves innervated by the cervical spinal cord, induce local insufficient blood supply to the neck and shoulder, and lead to neck-shoulder pain and limited ROM, thus increasing the risk of AS [13]. Spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury may result from decompression following long-term compression, so the spinal cord undergoes congestion and edema, a large number of free radicals are generated, and inflammatory mediators are also secreted, thereby resulting in systemic inflammatory responses [14]. Ruan et al. also identified that increased PSCR was a significant risk factor for developing AS following EOLP [15].

Secondly, during modified EOLP, the posterior cervical ligamentous complex may be destroyed in the structure, and the posterior cervical muscles, nuchal ligament and posterior bony structure may be damaged, resulting in the loss of cervical ROM [16]. As a result, patients have weakened neck strength and long-term inability to move the neck, so local tissue adhesion and scar formation may occur after surgery, thus inducing AS [17,18]. Meanwhile, intervertebral controllability is weakened and the corresponding intervertebral torque and stress are concentrated due to decreased postoperative intervertebral flexion-extension ROM, so the degeneration of adjacent vertebrae that cannot tolerate shear or rotation is accelerated, and the risk of AS is increased [19]. Thus, more attention should be paid to the dynamic balance of cervical spine curvature and intervertebral flexion-extension ROM under postoperative physiological load. Intraoperative correction should not be overdone to obtain the static balance of cervical spine curvature and intervertebral flexion-extension ROM. Likewise, Lindenmann et al. reviewed the motion ranges and biomechanical impacts under physiological loads, which were crucial for maintaining both static and dynamic balance post-surgery [20].

Thirdly, excessive spinal cord posterior displacement may increase the traction against C₄ and C₅ cervical root in the bony fiber canal, then diminishing the function of cervical semispinalis muscles innervated by C₄ and C₅ cervical root [21]. The cervical semispinalis muscle is important for cervical stability, and it bears about 30% of the power for the function of cervical posterior extensors. In the case of function decline of the cervical semispinalis muscle, other posterior extensors begin to maintain the cervical dynamic stability in a compensatory way, so they are more prone to fatigue and injury, finally raising the risk of postoperative AS [22]. Therefore, a short distance (< 2 mm) of posterior displacement can provide enough space for relieving spinal cord compression. The main purpose of surgery is to obtain a satisfactory decompression effect, and there is no need to maximize the distance of posterior displacement. The patient‘s state should be fully assessed before surgery and closely observed after surgery to treat possible complications in a timely manner, thus reducing the risk of AS [23].

 

Conclusion

In conclusion, increased PSCR and increased postoperative spinal cord posterior displacement distance were risk factors for AS after modified EOLP, and elevated postoperative intervertebral flexion-extension ROM was a protective factor. Paying particular attention to these factors may help decrease the incidence rate of AS after modified EOLP.

 

Ethical principles

The entire study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (as revised in 2004 and 2008). The study was approved by The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (approval No. 2020-157) on May 5, 2020. Patients and there family members signed the informed consent form.

 

Conflicting interests

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest in relation to the subject of the study.