Rehabilitation of facial paresis due to a lesion of the facial nerve in clinical practice

Česká verze

Authors: H. Zimermanová ¹; M. Janatová ^2,3; M. Grünerová Lippertová ¹
Authors place of work: Klinika rehabilitačního lékařství 3. LF UK a FNKV Praha ¹; Katedra informačních a komunikačních technologií v lékařství, FBMI, ČVUT, Praha ²; Centrum podpory aplikačních výstupů a spin-off fi rem, 1. LF UK, Praha ³
Published in the journal: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2024; 87(5): 322-327
Category: Přehledný referát
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/cccsnn2024322

Summary

Facial nerve lesions lead to a variety of functional, motor, and psychological limitations in all stages of the disease. Acute therapy in neurology and neurosurgery has long defined procedures based on evidence-based medicine. However, in follow-up, rehabilitation therapy procedures are inconsistent, with therapies applied according to empirical experience with little support from the evidence. Currently, some procedures are already being validated, but still either in a small sample of patients or only in individual areas. For example, in the field of electrotherapy, methodologies are inconsistent, without clearly defined recommendations. There are also no conclusive data on the effect of relaxation methods, massage, and manual lymphatic drainage. The use of mirror therapy and virtual therapy with biofeedback is positive, but here too, there appears a need for standardization of practice and the addition of evidence.

Keywords:

Facial nerve – therapy – evidence – palsy

Zdroje

1. Ambler Z, Bednařík J, Růžička E et al. Klinická neurologie. Část obecná. Praha: Triton 2008.

2. Ambler Z. Periferní paréza nervus facialis. Intern Med 2010; 12 (9): 445–447.

3. Gutinas-Lichius O, Schaitikin B. Facial nerve disorders and diseases diagnosis and managment. New York: Thieme 2016.

4. Truelsen T, Piechowski-Jozoviak B, Bonita R et al. Stroke incidience and prevalence in Europe: a review of avaible data. Eur J Neurol 2006; 13 (6): 581–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01138.x.

5. Volf GF, Steinerstauch A, Lorenz A et al. Facial motor and non-motor disabilities in patients with central facial paresis: a prospective short study. J Neurol 2018; 266 (1): 46–56. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-9099-x.

6. Dobel C, Miltner WHR, Witte OW et al. Emotional impact of facial palsy. Laryngorinootologie 2003; 92 (1): 9–23. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327624.

7. Konečný P, Elfmark M, Horák S et al. Central facial paresis and its impact on mimicry, psyche and quality of live in patients after stroke. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2014; 158 (1): 133–137. doi: 10.5507/bp.2013.014.

8. Skevington SM, Day R, Chisholm A et al. How much do doctors use quality of live information in primary care? Testing the trans-theoretical model of behaviour change. Qual Live Res 2005; 14 (4): 911–922. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-3710-6.

9. Hotton M, Huggons E, Hamlet C et al. The psychosocial impact of facial palsy: a systematic review. Br J Health Psychol 2020; 25 (3): 695–727. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12440.

10. Hamlet C, Williamson H, Hotton M et al. „Your face freezes and so does your life“: a qualitative exploration of adults’ psychosocial experiences of living with acquired facial palsy. Br J Health Psychol 2021; 26 (3): 977–994. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12515.

11. Pinkiewicz M, Dorobisz K, Zatoński T. A comprehensive approach to facial reanimation: a systematic review. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (10): 2890. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102890.

12. Coulson SE, O’dwyer NJ, Adams RD et al. Expression of emotion and quality of life after facial nerve paralysis. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25 (6): 1014–1019. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200411000-00026.

13. Chee GH, Nedzelski JM. Facial nerv grading systems. Facial Plast Surg 2000; 16 (4): 315–324. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-15547.

14. Kang TS, Vrabec JT, Giddings N et al. Facial nerve grading systems (1985–2002): beyond the House-Brackmann scale. Otol Neurotol 2002; 23 (5): 767–771. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200209000-00026.

15. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93 (2): 146–147. doi: 10.1177/019459988509300202.

16. Yen TL, Driscoll CL, Lalwani AK. Significance a of House--Brackmann facial nerve grading global score in the setting off differential facial nerve function. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24 (1): 118–122. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200 301000-00023.

17. Stennert E, Limberg CH, Frentrup KP. An index for paresis and defective healing – an easily applied method for objectively determining therapeutic results in facial paresis. HNO 1977; 25 (7): 238–245.

18. Neely JG, Cherian NG, Dickerson CB et al. Sunny brook facial grading system: reliability and criteria for grading. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (5): 1038–1045. doi: 10.1002/lary.20868.

19. Ross BG, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 144 (3): 380–386. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989670206-1.

20. Ng JH, Ngo RYS. The use of the facial clinimetric evaluation scale as a patient based grading system in Bell‘s palsy. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (5): 1256–1260. doi: 10.1002/lary.23790.

21. VanSwerigen JM, Brach JS. The facial disability for disorders of the facial neuromuscular system. Phys Ther 1996; 76 (12): 1288–1298. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.12.1288.

22. Khan JB, Gliklich RE, Boyev KP et al. Validation of a pacient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: the FaCE scale. Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (3): 387–398. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200103000-00005.

23. Volk GB, Granitzka T, Kreysa H et al. Nonmotor disabilities in patients with facial measured by patient-reported outcom measures. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (7): 1516–1523. doi: 10.1002/lary.25695.

24. Teixeira LJ, Valbuza JS, Prado GF. Physical therapy for Bell‘s palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis). Cochren Database Syst Rev 2011; 12: CD006283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006283.pub3.

25. Karr E, Hotzenköcherle S. Konservative Gesichtstherapie bei peripherer Fazialispareze. Hausarzt Praxis 2019; 14 (9): 38–39.

26. Pereira LM, Obara K, Diaz JM et al. Facial exercise therapy for facial palsy: systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Rehabil 2011; 25 (7): 649–658. doi: 10.1177/0269215510395634.

27. Cardoso JR, Teixeira EC, Moreira MD et al. Effects of exercises on Bell‘s palsy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29 (4): 557–560. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816c7bf1.

28. Cardoso JR, Teixeira EC, Moreira MD et al. Effects of exercises on Bell‘s palsy: systematic review of a randomized controlled trials. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29 (4): 557–560. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816c7bf1.

29. Niscari M, Mancini P, De Seta D et al. Efficacy of early physical terapy in severe Bell‘s palsy: randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27 (6): 542–551. doi: 10.1177/1545968313481280.

30. Pourmomeny AA, Zadmehre H, Mirshamsi M et al. Prevention of synkinesis by biofeedback therapy: a randomized clinical trial. Otol Neurotol 2014; 35 (4): 739–742. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000217.

31. Chen N, Zhou M, He L et al. Acupuncture for Bell‘s palsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 2010 (8): CD002914. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002914. pub5.

32. Martineau S, Martel-Sauvageau V, Piette E et al. A pilot study on the mirror effect plus protocol: a standardized and adapted facial rehabilitation for acute Bell‘s palsy. C J Speech Lang-PA 2020; 44 (2): 57–72.

33. Gil-Martinéz A, Lerma-Lara S, Hernand-Jorge A et al. Influence of mirror therapy (specular face software) on electromyographic behavior of the facial muscles for facial palsy. Brain Sci 2021; 11 (7): 930. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070930.

34. Hao J, Pu Y, Chen Z et al. Effects of virtual reality--based telerehabilitation for stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2023; 32 (3): 106960. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106960.

35. Cacciante L, Kiper P, Garzon M et al. Telerehabilitation for people with aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Commun Disord 2021; 92: 106111. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106111.

36. Vellata C, Belli S, Balsamo F et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation on motor impairments, non-motor symptoms and compliance in patients with Parkinson‘s disease: a systematic review. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 627999. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.627999.

37. Sourtiji H, Khalaji M, Monfared E. Telerehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis: a scoping review. J Modern Rehabil 2023; 17 (1). doi: 10.18502/jmr.v17i1.11289.

38. Özden F, Özkeskin M, Süleyman MA. Physical exercise intervention via telerehabilitation in patients with neurological disorders: a narrative literature review. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg 2022; 58 (1): 26. doi: 10.1186/s41983-022-00461-1.

39. Cavallaro F, Portaro S, Pintaudi T et al. Remote cognitive therapeutic exercise in facial nerve palsy rehabilitation: pandemic tips and tricks. Innov Clin Neurosci 2023; 20 (1–3): 10–12.

40. de Sire A, Marotta N, Agostini F et al. A telerehabilitation approach to chronic facial paralysis in the COVID-19 pandemic scenario: what role for electromyography assessment? J Pers Med 2022; 12 (3): 497. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030497.