Surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysm recurrence after clipping
Authors:
A. Hejčl- 1 3; M. Stratilová 1; A. Sejkorová 1; R. Bartoš 1; F. Cihlář 4; M. Sameš 1
Authors place of work:
Neurochirurgická klinika Univerzity J. E. Purkyně, Masarykova nemocnice, Ústí nad Labem
1; Mezinárodní centrum klinického výzkumu (ICRC), FN u sv. Anny v Brně
2; Ústav experimentální medicíny Akademie věd ČR, v. v. i., Praha
3; Radiologická klinika Univerzity J. E. Purkyně, Masarykova nemocnice, Ústí nad Labem
4
Published in the journal:
Cesk Slov Neurol N 2023; 86(6): 351-358
Category:
Přehledný referát
doi:
https://doi.org/10.48095/cccsnn2023351
Summary
Recurrence of intracranial aneurysms (IA) after surgical treatment (aneurysm clipping) is relatively rare in clinical practice. The treatment of such an aneurysm requires an individualized approach based on precise medical imaging and experience of the team. Surgical treatment of recurrent aneurysms is technically more demanding compared to primary surgery especially due to postoperative changes. The goal of this study is to review current knowledge and management of recurrent IA after clipping and present our experience with such cases.
Keywords:
intracranial aneurysm – clip – cerebral angiography – medical imaging
Zdroje
1. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360 (9342): 1267–1274. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736 (02) 11314-6.
2. Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A et al. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 2015; 385 (9969): 691–697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (14) 60975-2.
3. Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Zabramski JM et al. Ten- -year analysis of saccular aneurysms in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2019; 132 (3): 771–776. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.JNS181846.
4. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Birks J et al. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8 (5): 427–433. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422 (09) 70080-8.
5. Mitchell P, Kerr R, Mendelow AD et al. Could late rebleeding overturn the superiority of cranial aneurysm coil embolization over clip ligation seen in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial? J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (3): 437–442. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/3/ 0437.
6. McKissock W. Recurrence of an intracranial aneurysm after excision. J Neurosurg 1965; 23 (5): 547–548. doi: 10.3171/jns.1965.23.5.0547.
7. Feuerberg I, Lindquist C, Lindqvist M et al. Natural history of postoperative aneurysm rests. J Neurosurg 1987; 66 (1): 30–34. doi: 10.3171/jns.1987.66.1.0030.
8. Drake CG, Friedman AH, Peerless SJ. Failed aneurysm surgery. Reoperation in 115 cases. J Neurosurg 1984; 61 (5): 848–856. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.5.0848.
9. David CA, Vishteh AG, Spetzler RF et al. Late angiographic follow-up review of surgically treated aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (3): 396–401. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.3.0396.
10. Johnston SC, Dowd CF, Higashida RT et al. Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008; 39 (1): 120–125. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.495747.
11. Ihm EH, Hong CK, Shim YS et al. Characteristics and management of residual or slowly recurred intracranial aneurysms. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010; 48 (4): 330–334. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.48.4.330.
12. Safavi-Abbasi S, Moron F, Sun H et al. Techniques and outcomes of gore-tex clip-wrapping of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2016; 90: 281–290. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.109.
13. Jabbarli R, Pierscianek D, Wrede K et al. Aneurysm remnant after clipping: the risks and consequences. J Neurosurg 2016; 125 (5): 1249–1255. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151536.
14. Kivisaari RP, Porras M, Ohman J et al. Routine cerebral angiography after surgery for saccular aneurysms: is it worth it? Neurosurgery 2004; 55 (5): 1015–1024. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000141043.07303.60.
15. Proust F, Toussaint P, Hannequin D et al. Outcome in 43 patients with distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 1997; 28 (12): 2405–2409. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2405.
16. Marbacher S, Gruter BE, Wanderer S et al. Risk of intracranial aneurysm recurrence after microsurgical clipping based on 3D digital subtraction angiography. J Neurosurg 2022; 138 (3): 717–723. doi: 10.3171/2022.5.JNS22 424.
17. Matheus MG, Castillo M. Development of de novo intracranial aneurysm in three months: case report and literature review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24 (4): 709–710.
18. Tsutsumi K, Ueki K, Morita A et al. Risk of aneurysm recurrence in patients with clipped cerebral aneurysms: results of long-term follow-up angiography. Stroke 2001; 32 (5): 1191–1194. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.5.1191.
19. Wermer MJ, Greebe P, Algra A et al. Incidence of recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage after clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2005; 36 (11): 2394–2399. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000185686.28035.d2.
20. Han HJ, Lee W, Kim J et al. Incidence rate and predictors of recurrent aneurysms after clipping: long- -term follow-up study of survivors of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45 (5): 3209–3217. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01828-x.
21. Brown MA, Parish J, Guandique CF et al. A long-term study of durability and risk factors for aneurysm recurrence after microsurgical clip ligation. J Neurosurg 2017; 126 (3): 819–824. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.JNS152059.
22. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003; 34 (6): 1398–1403. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.885 63.E9.
23. Dujovny M, Kossovsky N, Kossowsky R et al. Intracranial clips: an examination of the devices used for aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery 1984; 14 (3): 257–267. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198403000-00001.
24. Sasidharan GM, Sastri SB, Pandey P. Aneurysm clips: what every resident should know. Neurol India 2015; 63 (1): 96–100. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.152666.
25. Sutherland GR, Kelly JJ, Boehm DW et al. Ceramic aneurysm clips. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (5 Suppl 2): ONS 400–ONS405. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000326025.93724.5f.
26. Brack A, Fischer G, Janssen G et al. Development of an artifact-free aneurysm clip. Curr Direct Biomed Eng 2016; 2 (1): 543–546. doi: 10.1515/cdbme-2016-0120.
27. Drake CG, Vanderlinden RG. The late consequences of incomplete surgical treatment of cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1967; 27 (3): 226–238. doi: 10.3171/jns.1967.27.3.0226.
28. Sindou M, Acevedo JC, Turjman F. Aneurysmal remnants after microsurgical clipping: classification and results from a prospective angiographic study (in a consecutive series of 305 operated intracranial aneurysms). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998; 140 (11): 1153–1159. doi: 10.1007/s007010050230.
29. Kobayashi S, Moroi J, Hikichi K et al. Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms after neck clipping: novel classification scheme and management strategies. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017; 13 (6): 670–678. doi: 10.1093/ons/opx033.
30. Spiotta AM, Hui F, Schuette A et al. Patterns of aneurysm recurrence after microsurgical clip obliteration. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (1): 65–69. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e 318276b46b.
31. da Silva Junior NR, Trivelato FP, Nakiri GS et al. Endovascular treatment of residual or recurrent intracranial aneurysms after surgical clipping. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2021; 23 (3): 221–232. doi: 10.7461/jcen. 2021.E2021.03.001.
32. Dawkins AA, Evans AL, Wattam J et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology 2007; 49 (9): 753–759. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-02 52-y.
33. Katsuki M, Narita N, Ishida N et al. Usefulness of 3 Tesla ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance angiography (UTE-MRA, SILENT-MRA) for evaluation of the mother vessel after cerebral aneurysm clipping: case series of 19 patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2021; 61 (3): 193–203. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0336.
34. Kemp WJ 3rd, Fulkerson DH, Payner TD et al. Risk of hemorrhage from de novo cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2013; 118 (1): 58–62. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS111512.
35. Spiessberger A, Vogt DR, Fandino J et al. Formation of intracranial de novo aneurysms and recurrence after neck clipping: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2019; 132 (2): 456–464. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS181281.
36. Zali A, Khoshnood RJ, Zarghi A. De novo aneurysms in long-term follow-up computed tomographic angiography of patients with clipped intracranial aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (5): 722–725. doi: 10.1016/ j.wneu.2013.06.008.
37. Rotim K, Raguz M, Rotim A et al. Late aneurysm relapse after microsurgical treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysm: a case report and literature review of treatment options. Acta Clin Croat 2020; 59 (3): 532–538.
Štítky
Dětská neurologie Neurochirurgie NeurologieČlánek vyšel v časopise
Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie
2023 Číslo 6
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Přehled difuzních gliomů dle WHO klasifikace 2021 1. část – difuzní gliomy dospělého typu
- Efekt psychoedukačního programu u pacientů s CMP v postakutní péči
- Paměťová rezerva a údržba paměti u superúspěšně stárnoucích osmdesátníků
- Chirurgická léčba recidivy intrakraniálních aneuryzmat po ošetření klipem